Skip to main content

A comparative analysis of legacy migration solutions, 2008

 Item — Call Number: MU Thesis ORe
Identifier: b2090066

Scope and Contents

From the Collection:

The collection consists of theses written by students enrolled in the Monmouth University graduate Software Engineering program. The holdings are bound print documents that were submitted in partial fulfillment of requirements for the Master of Science degree.

Dates

  • Creation: 2008

Creator

Conditions Governing Access

The collection is open for research use. Access is by appointment only.

Access to the collection is confined to the Monmouth University Library and is subject to patron policies approved by the Monmouth University Library.

Collection holdings may not be borrowed through interlibrary loan.

Research appointments are scheduled by the Monmouth University Library Archives Collections Manager (723-923-4526). A minimum of three days advance notice is required to arrange a research appointment for access to the collection.

Patrons must complete a Researcher Registration Form and provide appropriate identification to gain access to the collection holdings. Copies of these documents will be kept on file at the Monmouth University Library.

Extent

1 Items (print book) : 66 pages ; 8.5 x 11.0 inches (28 cm).

Language of Materials

English

Abstract

Despite the introduction of many advanced programming languages and the escalating cost of developing programs in COBOL, development of COBOL source code continues throughout the business community. Eventually, the cost of maintaining this code will be prohibitive. Migrating software systems from COBOL based implementations to modern programming implementations will be necessary. The migration of legacy systems involves some risk which can be mitigated by selection of the appropriate migration strategy. In this thesis, various migration strategies are examined in terms of the risks and benefits of each approach. A methodology for assessing a business domain for the specific purpose of selecting the appropriate strategy is presented. The identified methodology will be demonstrated using the business functions specific to a large complex insurance company. It will be shown that for this specific industry, that reengineering requirements and building a replacement system in-house is superior to implementing a commerical off-the-shelf (COTS) like the Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) system.

Partial Contents

1. Introduction -- 2. Background -- 3. Legacy replacement -- 4. Trade-off analysis -- 5. Insurance system -- 6. Conclusion -- 7. Bibliography.

Repository Details

Part of the Monmouth University Library Archives Repository

Contact:
Monmouth University Library
400 Cedar Avenue
West Long Branch New Jersey 07764 United States
732-923-4526